FTMO Futures Review (2026): Rules, Pricing, and Is It Worth It?
An honest FTMO Futures review covering Growth vs Pro, monthly pricing, EOD drawdown, payout rules, platforms, and whether the new futures product is worth buying.
Tradespad is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FTMO or FTMO s.r.o. This article summarizes publicly available product details and press coverage. It is not financial, legal, or investment advice. Prop firm rules, fees, and payout policies can change. FTMO Futures accounts are simulated demo accounts with fictitious funds unless you are invited to a live funded stage.
If you searched for an FTMO Futures review, you probably want three things: what actually launched, how Growth differs from Pro, and whether a monthly futures eval from a forex-famous brand is worth it. Short version: FTMO opened a real CME futures path in late summer 2026 (soft/beta coverage around 31 Aug, broader public push mid-September). Same company that built its name on CFD challenges. Different product. Different fee model than one-time US futures firms.
Score
7.7 / 10
Trusted brand, new futures book, monthly fees
A legitimate, long-running prop brand (FTMO s.r.o., since 2015) that finally ships futures with Growth/Pro plans, EOD trailing drawdown that locks at starting balance, Tradovate / NinjaTrader / TradingView, and a 90/10 split. The catch: evaluations are monthly subscriptions, futures payout history is still young, and the futures UI is English-only. Strong if you already trust FTMO and can pass without many reset months. Weak if you want a flat one-time fee.
FTMO Futures at a glance
| Category | Score | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Legitimacy / brand | 9.0 / 10 | Czech firm since 2015; large Trustpilot sample for the company, not just futures |
| Rules & fairness | 7.5 / 10 | EOD trailing DD that locks at start; Growth has no hard daily loss on eval |
| Pricing value | 6.5 / 10 | Monthly sub until you pass; cheap if you pass fast, expensive if you reset for months |
| Product maturity | 6.0 / 10 | Futures line is new (2026); CFD side is the long track record |
| Platforms & UX | 8.0 / 10 | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView; futures portal is English-only |
| Overall | 7.7 / 10 | Serious option if you like FTMO’s brand and can live with a monthly eval |
What FTMO Futures is
FTMO is a prop trading firm run by FTMO s.r.o. in the Czech Republic. For years the public product was forex and CFD challenges. FTMO Futures is a separate lane: you buy an evaluation, trade simulated CME futures under risk rules, then move to a Sim-Funded account where you can request a 90/10 profit split. Live funded capital is described as an invite / discretionary step after sim-funded performance — not something you buy at checkout. Same internet prop model. Different asset class. If you want the bigger picture, read Are Prop Firms a Scam?.
Official materials list sizes of $50K, $100K, and $150K, two plan families (Growth and Pro), and platforms traders already know: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView. You can hold up to 3 Sim-Funded accounts at once (up to $450K simulated capital). The futures client area is English only even if the rest of ftmo.com is localized.
- Futures evaluation + Sim-Funded path (CME-style contracts on sim)
- Monthly subscription for the Evaluation until you pass (then it cancels)
- No activation fee when you move to Sim-Funded
- EOD trailing max drawdown that locks once it reaches starting balance
- 90/10 payout ratio on Sim-Funded
- Consistency rule on Evaluation only (removed on Sim-Funded)
- Tradovate / NinjaTrader / TradingView platform access
Growth vs Pro (2026)
You pick a plan and a size. Profit targets are the same on both plans for a given size. The trade-off is fee vs room vs how much you can withdraw once funded.
Official FTMO Futures comparison snapshot (Growth vs Pro). Confirm on ftmo.com before you pay — numbers move.
| Item | Growth | Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pitch | Lower fees, easier path to Sim-Funded | More drawdown room, higher payout caps, 100% withdrawable |
| Profit target (50 / 100 / 150K) | $3K / $6K / $9K | $3K / $6K / $9K |
| Max DD EOD trailing (50 / 100 / 150K) | $2K / $3.5K / $5K | $3K / $4.5K / $6K |
| Daily loss (Evaluation) | None | Hard $1K / $1.5K / $2K |
| Consistency (Evaluation) | Best day ≤ 40% of total profit | Best day ≤ 50% of total profit |
| Max contracts | 5 / 10 / 15 | 5 / 10 / 15 |
| Monthly fee (50 / 100 / 150K) | $119 / $169 / $229 | $139 / $199 / $269 |
| Reset fee (same sizes) | $109 / $159 / $219 | $129 / $189 / $259 |
| Sim-Funded withdrawable | 50% of available | 100% of available |
| Payout cadence | Every 4 days (with day/profit gates) | Every 5 days (with day/profit gates) |
Growth is the cheaper door: no hard daily loss on the eval, tighter consistency (40%), smaller drawdown, and once funded you only withdraw half of available balance per the published table. Pro costs more each month, adds a hard daily loss on eval and funded, gives more DD room, lets you withdraw 100% of available (subject to caps and buffers), and posts higher per-request payout caps.
How the Evaluation and Sim-Funded stages work
Pass path is one Evaluation phase, then Sim-Funded. FTMO assesses eligibility after the trading day closes. You need the profit target and all objectives at the same time — including consistency on the eval.
Drawdown that locks at start balance
Max drawdown is end-of-day trailing. As equity makes new highs, the floor can trail up. Once that floor reaches your starting balance, it locks there. That is more forgiving than a pure trailing that keeps chasing forever, and stricter than a static soft break if you do not understand when the lock happens. Journal it like a hard rule, not a vibe.
Consistency only on the test
On Evaluation, your best day cannot be more than 40% (Growth) or 50% (Pro) of total profit. Smash the target in one session and you can still fail for being “too good” that day. On Sim-Funded, FTMO’s public comparison table says no consistency rule. That is a real product difference versus firms that keep consistency forever.
Sim-Funded payouts
Sim-Funded has no profit target. You earn under risk limits and request payouts. Official comparison rules at the time of writing: 90/10 split, minimum withdrawable $20, and a “new profit” buffer (about 50% of the requested amount as min new profit). Growth uses soft daily loss limits; Pro keeps hard daily loss. Payout cadence is every 4 days (Growth) or every 5 days (Pro), but only after you hit the qualifying-day gates (for example Growth 50K: 4 days each at $150+). That is the official clock — not a separate 14-day wait borrowed from other firms.
Sim-Funded payout caps per request (official comparison table snapshot).
| Size | Growth cap | Pro cap |
|---|---|---|
| $50K | $2,500 | $5,000 |
| $100K | $3,000 | $6,000 |
| $150K | $4,000 | $8,000 |
Pricing (2026)
Unlike many US futures props that sell a one-time eval, FTMO Futures bills a recurring monthly subscription while you are in Evaluation. Pass, and the subscription cancels — no ongoing fee and no activation fee for Sim-Funded in the published materials. Breach and stay subscribed: you get a fresh eval on the next billing date. Or pay a reset fee sooner under the same subscription ID.
| SKU | Monthly | Reset | Target | Max DD (EOD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth 50K | $119 | $109 | $3,000 | $2,000 |
| Growth 100K | $169 | $159 | $6,000 | $3,500 |
| Growth 150K | $229 | $219 | $9,000 | $5,000 |
| Pro 50K | $139 | $129 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Pro 100K | $199 | $189 | $6,000 | $4,500 |
| Pro 150K | $269 | $259 | $9,000 | $6,000 |
Buyer math: pass in week two on Growth 50K and you paid roughly one $119 cycle. Fail for four months and you are in $476+ before resets. That is why monthly futures products punish slow learners more than one-time fees. Treat every month as money you can lose, then practice the consistency and DD rules in a journal before you renew.
Platforms, markets, and the English-only catch
FTMO points futures traders at Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView — the stack most CME day traders already use. Instruments are futures (think index, energy, metals contracts on the allowed list). The awkward bit for non-English speakers: FTMO explicitly says FTMO Futures is English only while the rest of the site can stay in your language. Support and rule reading still need English fluency for this product.
- Tradovate / NinjaTrader / TradingView as the published platform set
- Market data included with the Evaluation subscription (per FTMO FAQ language)
- Up to 3 Sim-Funded accounts / $450K simulated capital ceiling
- Unlimited Evaluation accounts in marketing copy — still pay per subscription
- Live Funded described as a later, invite-style step after sim performance
Trust, launch timing, and legitimacy
Is FTMO a scam? No — not in the “fake company” sense. FTMO s.r.o. has operated since 2015, publishes legal entity details, and carries a large Trustpilot footprint for the wider brand (company pages often cite roughly 4.8 / 5). Industry press covered the futures soft launch around 31 August 2026 (Finance Magnates and others), with FTMO’s own futures pages dating through September–October 2026 updates.
What you should not blur together: CFD challenge reputation vs futures payout experience. Futures is new. Early reviews will mix “I trust FTMO” with “I have not taken a futures payout yet.” That is expected for a 2026 product line. Legitimacy is high. Futures-specific track record is still forming.
Pros, cons, and who it is for
Pros
- Established prop brand since 2015 (FTMO s.r.o.)
- Clear Growth vs Pro choice with published numbers
- EOD trailing drawdown that locks at starting balance
- No activation fee; subscription cancels when you pass
- No consistency rule on Sim-Funded (eval only)
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView support
Cons
- Monthly subscription can get expensive if you reset for months
- Futures product is new — limited futures-specific payout history
- Futures UI / docs lane is English-only
- Growth only lets you withdraw 50% of available on Sim-Funded
- Pro adds hard daily loss on eval and funded
- Live capital is not the default checkout path
Best for
- Futures traders who already trust FTMO’s brand and compliance style
- People who can pass without many billing cycles
- Traders who want EOD DD and no funded consistency rule
- NinjaTrader / Tradovate / TradingView users
Skip if you want
- A flat one-time eval fee like many US futures props
- Years of public futures payout proof before you send money
- A fully localized non-English futures portal
- A first challenge with no journaling or risk process
FTMO Futures vs other futures prop firms
If you are shopping funding, you are picking fee shape, drawdown pain, and how annoying withdrawals are. The table below is a $50K snapshot at the time of writing. Promos change weekly. Always confirm checkout.
$50K futures comparison. FTMO prices are monthly until pass; several US names are one-time.
| Firm | 50K entry | Extra to fund | Split | Fee shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTMO Growth | $119/mo | $0 activation | 90/10 | Monthly until pass |
| FTMO Pro | $139/mo | $0 activation | 90/10 | Monthly until pass |
| Lucid Flex | ~$136 one-time (often less on promo) | $0 activation | 90/10 | One-time |
| Topstep Combine | ~$49–$95/mo until pass | $0–$149 activation | 90/10 | Monthly + possible activation |
| Apex | ~$147 list (promos can drop hard) | Often $0 on current paths | 100% early, then 90/10 | One-time (sale-driven) |
Same $50K lane: drawdown style and what the brand is actually selling.
| Firm | Drawdown | Brand age | Best if you… |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTMO Futures | EOD trailing, locks at start | Firm since 2015; futures since 2026 | Want a known EU prop brand on CME sim |
| Lucid | EOD trailing on most plans | Futures firm from 2025 | Want one-time fees and very fast US payouts |
| Topstep | Stricter on Combine; EOD later | 12+ years in futures props | Care more about futures track record than sticker price |
| Apex | EOD or intraday by product | Long-running US futures prop | Want scale, stacking, and promo pricing |
Simple buyer math: if you pass in the first billing cycle, FTMO’s monthly model is fine and the brand is a plus. If you need three resets across three months, a one-time Lucid or Apex purchase often wins on total cash out. Topstep still wins on how long they have been a futures prop. FTMO wins when you specifically want FTMO’s compliance brand on futures and you like Growth’s no-hard-daily-loss eval.
Pick FTMO Growth if you want the cheaper monthly door and can live with 50% withdrawable and a 40% consistency cap on the test. Pick FTMO Pro if you want more DD room and full withdrawable balance once funded. Pick Lucid (see our Lucid Trading review) if you hate subscriptions. Skip the whole category if you still do not have a process. The fee will not invent one.
If you do buy FTMO Futures, treat it like work. Log the trades, tag rule risk, and check trailing DD before the close. Tradespad is for that habit on challenge and funded sim accounts, plus backtesting when you want to practice without buying another month.
Final verdict
FTMO Futures is a real futures product from a long-running prop firm: Growth/Pro plans, EOD trailing drawdown that locks at start, 90/10 on Sim-Funded, and serious platforms. 7.7 / 10. It wins on brand age and a clean published rule table. It loses on monthly eval fees, a still-young futures payout story, and an English-only futures lane. If you already trade futures with discipline and like FTMO, put Growth or Pro on the shortlist. If you are buying a challenge to “get funded” with no process, you are paying for the test, not the capital. Check live rules on ftmo.com, then review the account in a journal like Tradespad before you stack more subscriptions.
If you're looking for the best journaling and backtesting software, Tradespad is for you.
Try for freeFrequently Asked Questions Common searches before buying FTMO Futures: legitimacy, Growth vs Pro, monthly pricing, consistency, EOD drawdown, payout cadence, account limits, CFD vs futures, platforms, and who it is for.
Yes. FTMO Futures is a real product from FTMO s.r.o., a Czech prop firm operating since 2015. Industry press covered the futures soft launch around 31 August 2026. Company-wide Trustpilot scores are strong, but futures-specific payout history is still young because the product line is new. Legitimacy of the company is not the same thing as a long futures payout track record.
Growth is cheaper, has no hard daily loss on the evaluation, a tighter 40% consistency cap, smaller drawdown, and only 50% of available balance withdrawable on Sim-Funded. Pro costs more monthly, adds a hard daily loss, allows a 50% consistency cap on the eval, gives more drawdown room, higher payout caps, and 100% withdrawable available balance once funded. Profit targets are the same for each account size.
A recurring monthly subscription while you are in Evaluation. You are charged when you buy and on the same date each month until you pass or cancel. When you pass, FTMO cancels the subscription. There is no activation fee for Sim-Funded in the published materials. Resets are a separate fee under the same subscription.
At the time of writing, Growth 50K is $119 per month and Pro 50K is $139 per month, with reset fees of $109 and $129 respectively. Larger sizes cost more. Always confirm the live checkout on ftmo.com because prices can change.
Sim-Funded accounts use a 90/10 split in FTMO’s official comparison table. Growth can withdraw 50% of available balance; Pro can withdraw 100% of available, subject to per-request caps and a min-new-profit buffer. Official cadence is every 4 days on Growth or every 5 days on Pro after you meet the qualifying-day profit gates (for example four days at $150+ on Growth 50K). Minimum payout is $20.
FTMO’s public futures materials list Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView. The FTMO Futures client experience is English-only even if the rest of the FTMO site is localized.
Yes on the Evaluation only. Growth caps your best day at 40% of total profit; Pro caps it at 50%. FTMO’s official comparison table removes the consistency rule on Sim-Funded accounts. Passing still requires the profit target and all other objectives at the same time.
Max drawdown is end-of-day trailing. The floor can trail up as you make new highs, then locks permanently once it reaches your initial simulated capital. Growth has no hard daily loss on the evaluation; Pro adds a hard daily loss on both evaluation and Sim-Funded. Growth Sim-Funded uses soft daily loss limits.
Official cadence is every 4 days on Growth or every 5 days on Pro after you meet the qualifying-day profit gates for your account size. Per-request caps apply, Growth can withdraw 50% of available balance, Pro can withdraw 100% of available, and the published minimum payout is $20. Confirm live rules before you plan cashflow.
There is no published limit on concurrent Evaluation accounts, but each runs on its own monthly subscription. You can hold up to three Sim-Funded accounts at once across Growth and Pro, marketed as up to $450,000 in simulated capital. Holding more through multiple registrations is not permitted.
No. FTMO Futures is a separate product with its own rules, monthly evaluation billing, Sim-Funded payout path, and futures platforms. The long-running FTMO CFD / forex challenges are a different lane. Do not assume CFD objectives, platforms, or payout timing apply to Futures.
Usually no, not as a first trading expense. Monthly subscriptions punish slow learning more than one-time fees. FTMO Futures can fit traders who already have a repeatable futures process and can follow EOD drawdown and consistency rules. Build a journaled track record first. Tradespad is useful for reviewing challenge and funded sim accounts before you pay another month, and our prop firm explainer covers why most buyers lose the fee.
Details in this article may be outdated or incomplete. Always read the live rules, restricted countries, and payout terms on ftmo.com/en/futures before you pay.